Tuesday 15 August 2017

The dynamic image: Hyperphotography

Sources:
Coberlin (2014) Lecture. Fred Ritchin. Bending the Frame. [online] [Accessed 1/7/17] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=541UY8jgkxU
Ritchin, F. (2008) Towards a Hyperphotography: After Photography. New York. W.W. Norton and co. (Pp 141-162)

Towards a hyperphotography
Hyperphotography is an emerging paradigm (Ritchin, 2009:141) which enables digital photographs to be “linked, transmitted, recontextualised and fabricated” in a way which is not done with analogue photographs. Because a digital photo is composed of rows of pixels which are individually defined by colour and hue rather than chemicals, it makes it easier to modify and change the original photo. Whereas an analogue photo records a fraction of the second and is taken at the decisive moment, the digital photo can be made to appear longer by joining it to hyperlinks and other media. Ideas using hyperphotography include surveillance (baby monitors, CCTV, webcam live streaming, Facebook live etc) and a snapshot can be taken from the streaming. Time becomes elastic – it is more about the position of the observer.

The photograph’s frame stores information which helps to contextualise and amplify the meaning of the image. 

Cameras are found in all sorts of places such as phones, walls, Google glasses, Dash cams (ethics are a consideration as the subject does not know that they are being recorded as the devices do not look like cameras.) Cameras are becoming the future and will be able to warn of disease and prevent avoidable fires by monitoring and alerting the user to potentially dangerous situations. Today the Guardian ran an article on a £99 fridge camera, cheaper than the market’s existing £4,500 fridges which along with an app monitors use by dates, sends messages to use up whatever is at the back of the fridge and suggests recipes in a bid to lessen food wastage.
Virtual portraits and avatars are more the norm rather than something which would have been in the future. Landscapes were made of unreal places by feeding photographs into a computer (Joan Fontcuberta “Landscapes without Memory (2005)”. This type of imagery was intended to assist people in reading the world and understand it differently from painting and analogue photographs.

Unmasking photo opportunities, cubistically
Cubism is about looking at the subject through different viewpoints. Ritchin compares two images of US soldiers in Haiti, the first is an image of soldiers lying on the ground pointing guns at the enemy, helicopter above creating some dust. The second shows a line of photographers taking the image and no helicopter. Ritchin explains that there is no single truth in a contradictory “double image” (2009:147) making us question what is really happening. Is it a set up photograph or are we at war?  If people in positions of authority know that there is a danger of being exposed setting up situations, they are less likely to go to extreme lengths to deceive the public.

Many photographs are simulation of an event. Powerful people have more control over a situation, whilst others are photographed in a conforming but not flattering manner.

“Photographs made consciously to echo other photographs, borrowing from their impact could be paired with the previous image, exposing the vacuity of the idea.” (Ritchin, 2009:149) Ritchin compares the raising of the flag at the World Trade Centre towers after their destruction with a flag being raised at Iwo Jima enabling the reader to view the two images side by side.


A recent article in The Guardian of President Trump’s inauguration (2017) compared his popularity to the inauguration of President Obama (2009).

Donald Trump’s inauguration crowd, left, and Barack Obama’s inauguration crowd. 
Photograph: Staff/Reuters


Two photos taken from a slightly different angle showing a soldier in Basra. The photojournalist then merged these 2 photos together which was spotted by someone in the publishing company. The paper challenged the photographer.

Photographing the future so a version of it does not happen
Analogue photographs depict what has happened in the past, but digital photography could predict the future. Scientists could show the public what global warming will look like in the future encouraging behavioural change. Ritchin (2009:150) cites Nancy Burson, Richard Carling and David Kramlich as developing morphed photographs of the missing child and their family to create an image of what they may look like now.
An article in The Telegraph online this week shows a morphed photograph of Madeline McCann, missing for 10 years detailing what she looked like at 3 years old compared to a morphed version of 13 years old.


Enfranchising the subject
Often photographs of people are used by newspapers to represent what is happening in the world, although the person “snapped” in a situation may not be stereotypical of the newspaper story. Ritchin cites a couple of examples in which the person became the symbol of the subject. It is important to give a subject a voice; he cites futuristic examples in which the subject of the photograph speaks out on the photograph. Luc Courchesne’s Portrait One https://vimeo.com/5827424 reminds me of AI characters in films. This is a theatrical presentation using a computer which can input, output and process data leading to real time interactivity and AV participation. The viewers become engaged asking the portrait questions from a selection on screen to which the portrait gives an answer. Courchesne has developed the idea to include a Family Portrait which seems more in depth. Ritchin suggests that if presidential candidates had this type of presentation, there may be more understanding from the press.

Ritchin explains that the power balance of photographers, readers, editors and subjects can be changed by the type of evidence that there is around. He cites Spencer Platt’s photograph of people driving through a war zone in which he labelled them as “Affluent Lebanese drive down the street to look at a destroyed neighbourhood 15 August 2006 in southern Beirut, Lebanon” (Ritchin 2009:153) when in fact they lived nearby and were not affluent.

Reporting as “family album”
Since 2003, Mojo (Mobile Journalism) has been used to document Tsunami’s, the Iraq war and reached its peak in the London Bombings in 2005. The news broadcasters work in partnership with the public using mobile phone apps to record eye witness accounts but try to promote a balanced view with good quality (Reuters: 2014)

Ritchin shows two photographers who have worked with people with PTSD following traumatic events. I really engaged with Monica Haller's Riley and his story because I have worked with people who came back from war zones and were not the same people. It seems much more personal and engaging than news reports. Jennifer Karady's Soldier Stories Statements are also powerful statements of the effects of war. I think in both of these it is the narrative which makes it personal and links the image to the event. 

Photographers have to depict the communities they photograph with empathy. The difference between working in analogue and digital is the amount of reflection time available to ensure the photographs are presented in a meaningful way.

Constructive Interventions
Work has been done around monitoring systems for the elderly in their own houses such as Digital Family Portrait. With sensors all over the house, the computer can work out what the person is up to and which activities of daily living they are doing. The interface is designed as a portrait and will store information to trigger whether they are becoming less active over time. The blurb advertises showing family photographs as a reminder of family which makes them supposedly feel less isolated. It doesn’t replace family interaction or social isolation but may provide peace of mind for family members who live a distance away. Other apps are available which allow you to keep track of family such as Snapchat which will show the location of friends and webcams to install in elderly relatives’ houses. I think that whilst cameras and apps may seem like progression into the field of digital technology, we still have to consider the ethics of surveillance and decide how much we are willing to embrace. Perhaps the position we find ourselves in with the technological advances in 2017 is similar to when Ritchin was writing this essay: new technology is a journey into the unknown and we have already seen questionable behaviour which makes authorities consider codes of conduct.

Bibliography
Archambaut, M. (2015) Interview: Michael Kamber on photojournalism ethics and the altering of images. Petapixel.  [online] Available at:  https://petapixel.com/2015/08/04/interview-michael-kamber-on-photojournalism-ethics-and-the-altering-of-images/ last accessed 14/8/17
Blythe, T. (2017) Madeline McCann: Police release new “age progression” image. In: The Telegraph. [online] Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9226178/Madeleine-McCann-Police-release-new-age-progression-image.html last accessed 13/8/17
Courchesne, L. (2002) Experiential Art: Case Study. [online] Available at: http://ic.media.mit.edu/courses/mas878/pubs/courchesne-02-experiential-art.pdf Last accessed 14/8/2017 Last accessed 15/8/17
Haller, M. (n.d.) Riley and his story: Me and my outrage: You and us. [online] Available at: http://www.rileyandhisstory.com/ last accessed 14/8/17
Levin, S. (2017) Trump pressured park chief for photos to prove media lied about inauguration crowd – report. In: The Guardian. [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/26/donald-trump-inauguration-crowd-size-national-parks-photos last accessed 13/8/17
Karady, J. (n.d.) Soldiers Stories Statements . Available at: http://jenniferkarady.com/soldier_stories20.html last accessed 14/8/17
Marrouch, R. (2014) How mobile phones are changing journalism practice in the 21st Century. [online] Available at: http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/how-mobile-phones-are-changing-journalism-practice-21st-century Last accessed 15/8/17
Pinterest (2017) Photojournalism. Available at: https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/536421005586704305/ last accessed 15/8/17
Premag (2016) Student conversations about Professional Responsibilities of the engineer: Ethical considerations of Google Glass. Available at: https://prestudentconversation.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/ethical-considerations-of-google-glass/ last accessed 13/8/17
Smithers, R. (2017) The war on food waste has a new weapon: a £99 fridge camera. In: The Guardian. [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/12/food-waste-smart-homes-fridge-cameras last accessed 13/8/17