Showing posts with label Research and reflection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Research and reflection. Show all posts

Tuesday, 18 September 2018

Regarding the torture of others: Susan Sontag

Source:  Sontag, S (2004) Regarding the torture of others.  Available at: www.nytimes.com/2004/05/23/magazine/regarding-the-torture-of-others.html last accessed March 2018

60 years (80 years now) “Western memory museum is now mostly a visual one” people remember events by photographs such as Abu Ghraib prisoners being tortured.
2 types of photos emerge from atrocities: 
1   Trophy photo- I/we were there and I/we did this e.g. lynching- collectively photographers thought it was OK to act in this way
2   Photos captured from atrocities – e.g. Abu Ghraib recording their part in the atrocity from fun to observations which are shared globally.
People are used to acting / posing for the camera.
Digital footprint - the picture is there permanently. What should be shown or edited out?

Selfie City: Alise Tifental

Source: Tifentale, A (2014) Selfie City Available at: http://d25rsf93iwlmgu.cloudfront.net/downloads/Tifentale_Alise_Selfiecity.pdf last accessed September 2018

2013 selfie was the “international word of the year”.
Vernacular photography and social media phenomenon.
Oxford dictionary “a photograph that one has taken of oneself, typically one taken with a smartphone or webcam and uploaded to a social media website.”
elfie encompasses digital self-portraits.
“A new way of not only representing ourself to others but of communicating with one another through images.” (Rawlings, 2013 as cited by Tifentale, 2014)
Only 4% of all photos posted on Instagram during one week for the selfie city project were actual selfies.
Early selfies – Robert Cornelius – daguerreotype (1839) Hippolyte Bayard self-portrait as drowned man (1840)
Early photographs of Americans on tour in Egyptian ruins can be described as building the “American self”  (Lingwood , 1986 as cited by Tifentale, 2014). Through self-portrait, the self is constructed. Performance. “The most intimate place for narcissistic contemplation, the room with the mirror – a bathroom for example – becomes in this context the most common of places, where every distinction of the self is in the end abolished.”  Chevrier (n.d)
Every self-portrait is the portrait of another which is a social construction.
Selfie consists of image and meta-data. It has likes and shares. Instagram – instantaneous – community – communal and public activity #’s
Photography – time and effort – not selfie if not shared on social media,
Selfies fit a small number of the population – young adults (median age 23.7 years in 2013
Selfies not an art form – Marche.  Images are not rare. Selfies have been exhibited in galleries e.g. National #Selfie Portrait Gallery in National Portrait Gallery in London, curated by Kyle Chayka and Marina Galperina.
Leica sponsored coffee table book.
Berger (2011) the experience of taking the photograph is more important than the pictures themselves.

Friday, 9 March 2018

Representation of nurses and nursing through popular image and culture

There are several articles covering the representation of nurses and nursing through popular image and culture which tend to feature examples of literature, TV shows and films. Historical content is covered but media and online sharing has developed over the last few years. One nurse researcher started to address images on YouTube, and now Gifs and memes have been added the image of nurses / nursing – often shared by nurses, colleagues of nurses and family and friends. Since the 1900’s, postcards collections have contained images of nurses and nursing, and now collections encompass Pinterest, Facebook and Twitter.

Darbyshire (2014) explains that there is more literature on images of nurses than other professional groups. Most of it is collated by nurses so he argues that nurses have the issue with the way in which they are portrayed.

Images of a modern caring nurse appeared in the 14th century which was a change from the Romano Greek idea of the baby nurse. Religious orders had caring nuns who taught women in communities how to care. But some were burnt as witches under religious persecution orders. In the 15th century, Kampers (1988) identifies the observation that “several features were common to the scenes of nursing sisters help to define the nature of their role; they nurse patients who are most often men lying in bed, they work in a distinctive location that does not look like a house, they wear distinctive costumes, their activities are domestic and religious rather than specifically medical and most importantly they are never subordinated to patients and doctors.” (Kampen, 1988 cited by Derbyshire, 2014).

The earliest referenced photographs of nurses were a few taken of Florence Nightingale during her career as a nurse which enhanced the stereotypical view of a nurse. Today nursing roles are many and varied, from community nurses to acute medical nurses, operating theatre nurses and including mental health and children’s specialisms. Nurses in the UK have been recruited internationally since the 1960’s and in 2007, Mary Seacole (Florence Nightingale’s Jamaican contemporary) was introduced to the National Curriculum in a bid to embrace multiculturalism? By comparison there is only one known photograph of Mary Seacole. This appears to show her place of work. She is cast in a very similar pose to Florence Nightingale with her head not looking towards the viewers.


Lizzie Cadwell Smith’s photograph (figure 6)showed the viewers a personal side of Nightingale. However, male photographers were still capturing the formal portrait. 


Figure 7 Red Cross Nurse (1924) 

August Sander’s photograph from People of the 20th Century was entitled “Occupation – group: the woman This studio portrait gives no clues as to the working conditions or location of the nurse.


























Figure 8 Nurse (1951) 
Irving Penn included the nurse portrait in his “Small Trades” body of work in the early 1950’s; a series of 250 portraits of people initially recruited from New York, London and Paris. Workers were photographed against a plain background wearing their uniform and with their tools. The nurse appears with her hands as tools of trade. Penn thought that “taking people away from their natural circumstances and putting them into the studio in front of a camera did not simply isolate them – it transformed them. (Penn, as cited by Elysée Lausanne, 2010). A press release for the J Paul Getty Museum (2009) describes Penn’s work as “austere and theatrical”. Lacoste (2009) explains that Penn conveys workers’ pride.



























Figure 9 Eight Student Nurses (1966) 
In I964, Gerhard Richter’s Eight Student Nurses painted from individual photographs of student nurses murdered by a serial killer, the nurses remain anonymous (although their names were published in a newspaper at the time) and the nurses gain collective identity. The typology paintings were the same size and Gerhard Richter blurred the images slightly as if to remove some identity but kept distinguishing features such as hairstyles.  





Figure 10 Surf safari Nurse (2002-3) 
Richard Prince’s nurse paintings (2002-08) use popular novels as the source material. Prince scans and prints onto canvas before painting, sometimes changing the book title. He retains the characteristics of the nurse and constructs a stereotypical fantasy. Viewers are asked to reconsider the American visual culture depicting the nurse.
















Modern student nurses are taught to critically review historical and contemporary representations of nursing so that they have a public and professional voice when dealing with major health care issues raised by the media and can challenge public perception.

“Even stereotypes are regarded as dubious, may after a measure of exposure become internalised and naturalised, they are thereby metamorphosed into categories of the normal, the real and the healthy and desirable.” (Delacour, 1991, as cited by Darbyshire, 2014) Academics have used different categorisations and the majority have been depicted in popular culture.

 “Muff (1982) suggests 6 major nursing stereotypes: Angel of mercy, handmaiden of the physician, Omen in white, Sex symbol / idiot, battle-axe, torturer.” (Darbyshire, 2014)

Dunn (1985) credits the average tabloid newspaper [with] only 3 types of nurse; angel, battle-axe and nymphomaniac. (Darbyshire, 2014)

Kelly’s (2011) YouTube study identifies 3 stereotypes, 2 are similar such as sexual plaything and witless incompetent although nurses are engaging with audiences through the skilled knower and doer stereotype although there may be more as it was a fairly small study and subjective interpretation by nurse researchers could equate differently if different groups of researchers undertook the same study.

Hoeve (2014) suggests that Bridges (1990) found 34 stereotypes. Kalisch and Kalisch (1981) categorised them into time frames. Angel of Mercy 1854-1919, Girl Friday 1920-1929, Heroine 1930-1945, Sex Object 1960-1982, Careerist 1983-present.

Angels with pretty faces and empty heads
Figure 11 The White Angel (1936) 
Figure 12 Lady with a lamp (1951)


Australian nurses in the 1800’s were “redefining image of nurses as motivated primarily by self-sacrifice.” (Bashford, 1997, as cited by Darbyshire, 2014) Nurses appeared in movies such as The White Angel (1936) and Lady with the Lamp (1951) which was Nightingale repackaged. Most cinema goers were women, so this was an ideal time to advertise to boost recruitment. Culturally women had become used to going out to work.

 In Catholicism, the symbol of the angel is used to obey, uncritical of what is written. Created by God – therefore women don’t need to be educated because they are divine and virtuous which opens arguments about pay, education and skills.

Doctor’s handmaidens
Figure 13 Chicago Hope (1994-2000)
This stereotype was based on military and Christian origins (Nelson 2001 as cited by Darbyshire, 2014)

A 19th century idea was that nurses helped the physician and not the patient. Skills were borrowed from physicians and were not questioned. Popular TV series such as Chicago Hope were developed.
This stereotype still exists among some nurses.



















Battle-axe
Figure 14 Carry On Nurse (1959) 

A battle-axe is represented as an asexual, large person who is usually cruel. These stereotypes have Feminist ideas and challenge male power. They could be in a managerial role e.g. matron. Hattie Jaques in Carry On Nurse (1959) and Carry on Matron (1972). There was over a decade between the two films but the stereotype remained the same.

In looking to address this stereotype, nurses removed the formality from their job titles – e.g. “Staff Nurse ….” to first name. Patients were not sure who was the nurse.  In a frightening theatre environment, first names still apply although job roles or descriptions are stated in introductions to patients because all staff wear scrubs.













Naughty nurse and nymphomaniac
“Translocated ideal” (Hunter 1988 as cited by Darbyshire, 2014)

In nursing, traditional social power relations are reversed when a patient comes into hospital. The balance of power is reversed, and men may sexualise the encounters with nurses and fantasize. Nurses work without sexualising the encounter. The nurse becomes a metaphor for sex and subservience to men and can be seen in pornographic films.

Skilled knower and doer
YouTube Nursing videos show techniques and celebrations featuring multi-cultural staff and male nurses. In Kelly’s YouTube presentation of her study, “The Image of You – constructing nursing identities in YouTube” (2011) she explains that identity is “contextually variable description that draws on cultural meanings and the kind of person that one is can be bounded by the acceptable descriptions available at a [particular historical – cultural juncture.” […] “It is socially constructed through public discourses, is a linguistic construction, can be constructed in written and spoken language and other texts such as photographs and film.” (Kelly, 2011)

Kelly (2011) argues that nurses who wanted “likes” on YouTube knew how to reach audiences in which they thought they were promoting the nurse as a skilled doer but used objectification and sometimes placed the nurse in the other 2 categories (witless incompetent and sexual plaything) without realising. The main users of YouTube are young males and YouTube sends a suggestion to the viewer based on what they have already watched thereby not overcoming the stereotype if the watcher has previously chosen to watch a sexual plaything video.

Other studies which have taken place include Stanley’s (2008) study of 36,000 film synopses. Early films showed self-sacrificial heroines, sex objects and romantics and later films showed “strong, self-confident individuals.” (as cited by Hoeve, 2014) In a bid to be more open about roles, a postcard collection collected by Nurse Michael Zwerdling held digitally in the National Library of Medicine includes 600 images of nurses from 1893-2007. This includes images such as male nurses in New Jersey (1910) and accurately represented theatre nurses in 1951 (USA). Images copyright – see link https://www.nlm.nih.gov/news/zwerdling_postcard_collection.html

There are two schools of thought around how nurses should respond to the stereotyping of nurses in the media. In comedy, it should probably be left alone. In documentary, nurses should work with the directors in ensuring there is accurate representation of their role. If the stereotypes are changed, what will they become? There is a tendency for nurses to avoid challenging the media as they do not handle negative criticism and inaccurate portrayal well. Kelly (2011) reasons that responsibility should lie with professional representatives to moderate YouTube content through lobbyists and individual responsibility should be mindful of uploading user generated content which can have a negative impact on stereotypical issues. Recommendations from her study included a counter discourse. Student nurses are taught about self-concept and public identity. “Negative public image has a negative impact on nurses’ self-concept and the development of their professional identity.” (Hoeve, 2014)


List of illustrations
Figure 1 Hering, H (1856-7) Florence Nightingale [photograph] Available at:  https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw111411/Florence-Nightingale?LinkID=mp03298&wPage=0&role=sit&rNo=10 Last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 2 Kilburn, W E (1856) Florence Nightingale [photograph] Available at: https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw123091/Florence-Nightingale?LinkID=mp03298&wPage=0&role=sit&rNo=11 Last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 3 Lenthall, H (1864-77) Florence Nightingale [photograph] Available at: https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw17094/Florence-Nightingale?LinkID=mp03298&wPage=0&role=sit&rNo=16 Last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 4 Mary Seacole (1873) [photograph] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Seacole last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 5 Payne, S G and son (1891) Florence Nightingale [postcard]Available at: https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw150696/Florence-Nightingale?LinkID=mp03298&wPage=1&role=sit&rNo=24 Last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 6 Caswell Smith, L  (1910) Florence Nightingale [photograph] Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1054508/Uncovered-The-haunting-photograph-Lady-Lamp-Florence-Nightingale.html last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 7 Sander, A (1924) Red Cross Nurse [photograph] Available at: https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/114368/red-cross-nurse-1924 last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 8 Penn, I.  (1951) Nurse (Small Trades) London. [photograph].  Available at: https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/5911043233885078/ last accessed 20/2/18
Figure 9 Richter, G (1966) Eight student nurses [oil on canvas] Available at: https://www.gerhard-richter.com/en/art/paintings/photo-paintings/death-9/eight-student-nurses-5770?&categoryid=9&p=1&sp=32&tab=notes-tabs last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 10 Prince, R (2002-3) Surf Safari Nurse [inkjet and acrylic on canvas] Available at: http://www.richardprince.com/paintings/nurses/ last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 11 The White Angel (1936) [movie poster] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_White_Angel_(1936_film) last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 12 Lady with the lamp (1951) [movie poster] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lady_with_a_Lamp last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 13 Chicago Hope (1994-2000) [photograph] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Hope last accessed 26/2/18
Figure 14 Carry On Nurse (1954) [photograph] Available at: http://www.britishpictures.com/photos/photo024.htm last accessed 26/2/18

References
Archino, S (2018) Richard Prince Artist and Overview. The Art Story [online] Available at: http://www.theartstory.org/artist-prince-richard-artworks.htm last accessed 24/2/18
Elysée Lausanne (2010) Irving Penn Small Trades [online press release] Available at: http://www.elysee.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/elysee/Medias/Dossiers/Documents/PressKit_Irving_Penn_EN.pdf  last accessed 20/2/18
Hallam, J. (2001) Nursing the images: Media, culture and professional identity. [online] Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucreative-ebooks/detail.action?docID=165601 last accessed 11/12/17
J Paul Getty Museum (2009) Irving Penn Small Trades [online press release] Available at: http://news.getty.edu/irving-penn-small-trades-related-events-and-publications.tekdownload last accessed 20/2/18
Kelly, J, Fealy, G and Watson, R. (2011) The image of you: constructing nursing identities in YouTube. Journal of Advanced Nursing. [online] Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/266629346/Journal-of-Advanced-Nursing-Volume-68-Issue-8-2012-Doi-10-1111-2Fj-1365-2648-2011-05872-x-Jacinta-Kelly-Gerard-M-Fealy-Roger-Watson-The-Image last accessed 11/12/17
Ten Hoeve, Y, Jansen, G and Roodbul, P (2014) The nursing profession: public image, self concept and professional identity. A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing70(2) 295-309 [online] Available at: http://www.truthaboutnursing.org/research/lit/orig/hoeve_2014_jan.pdf last accessed 11/12/17
US National Library of Medicine (2014) NLM launches “Pictures of Nursing: The Zwerdling Postacrd Collection” [online] Available at:   https://www.nlm.nih.gov/news/zwerdling_postcard_collection.html last accessed 12/12/17


Bibliography
Gomez, J (2018) Constructural Available at: https://www.juanagomez.com/constructal last accessed 2/3/18
National Galleries of Scotland (2018) National Galleries of Scotland. August Sander Available at: https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/114368/red-cross-nurse-1924#related-media-anchor last accessed 26/2/18
Prince, R (2018) Paintings Nurses Available at: http://www.richardprince.com/paintings/nurses/ last accessed 26/2/18

Tuesday, 23 January 2018

Panopticism

Source: Evans, J and Hall, S (ed) (1999) Panopticism: Michael Foucault. Visual Culture: The reader. Sage Publications Ltd. OCA Course material.

Bentham’s panopticon was an unbuilt circular building in which cells were places looking inwards to a central tower in which a supervisor observed the occupants. Bentham ensured that the occupants were not aware they were being watched by carefully designing the surveillance building so that shadows of the observers would not be seen. The cells could be used to witness people’s behaviour, separate them so they did not plot together or copy, and conduct human experiments. In the 19th century, this type of institution was used as a model for asylums, prisons, young offenders’ institutions and hospitals.

Foucault argues that two ways of exercising power over men are through separation or discipline (Evans and Hall, 1999:62) Often individuals were branded and put under surveillance which Foucault notes is still relevant in today's society. In a prison set-up, fewer security guards are needed which increases the power of their role on a large number of people. (Evans and Hall, 1999: 68) Because the panopticon is quiet and subtle the subject (an object of information rather than a subject in communication) become self-policing.

Prior to the 18th century, public floggings and executions involved punishing the body and created spectacle whereas panopticism was concerned with the soul and created surveillance. However, Foucault was concerned with calculated power and discipline (Green) The panopticism was a technology which diffused throughout society and initially used for discipline but actually increased productivity. (Green)

Foucault described “the carceral network in its compact or disseminated forms with its systems of insertion, distribution, surveillance; observation has been the greatest support in modern society of the normalising of power.” (Green)

Green argues that Foucault thought “multiple forms of domination permeate the social fabric. Power is not so much possessed as exercised through the myriad of institutions and discursive practices that exist at all levels of social life.” (Green)

Wells, (2011:176) documents Tagg’s study of criminals through archives from 1850-1970 using Foucault’s work to recognize how photography such as the process of surveillance is used to discipline people. This involved identification, classification, labelling and analysis. These techniques were used to develop bio-metric data systems in digital photographs for iris scans and fingerprints. Composite images are made up by the police to show the public what they think a criminal may look like. Contemporary photographers using this technique are Nancy Burson (1970’s), Thomas Ruff (1994) and Gerhard Lang (1992)

Surveillance through CCTV cameras as central inspection follows the idea of panopticism. However, CCTV does not offer supervision to help conduct activities better which was part of panopticism. Questions are also raised when browsing the internet such as whether we are still objects of information or whether our behaviour is being normalised through CCTV? McMullin (2015) argues that CCTV is to protect us from terrorist threats rather than providing security. Google / smart glass could be seen as surveillance, but who is doing the watching and what is their purpose? Snapchat and other social media sites – ephemeral images sent between users lasting for a short period of time can be captured and sent to data banks. Again, who is looking at these images. What power do they have? Is our behaviour being normalised by choosing what images we send?

References
Evans, J and Hall, S (ed) (1999) Panopticism: Michael Foucault. Visual Culture: The reader. Sage Publications Ltd. OCA Course material. 23/1/18
Green, D. (n.d.) On Foucault: Disciplinary Power and Photography [online] OCA course material 23/1/18
McMullan, T (2015) What does the panopticon mean in the age of digital surveillance? The Guardian [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/23/panopticon-digital-surveillance-jeremy-bentham last accessed 23/1/18
Wells, L (2011) Photography: A critical introduction. 4th edition. Routledge.  London. (P176)

Thursday, 7 September 2017

Atrocity and Action: The Performative Force of the Abu Ghraib Photographs (2012) Peggy Phelan

Source: Phelan, P (2012) Atrocity and Action: The Performative Force of the Abu Ghraib Photographs in Bachten, G. at al (eds) (2012) Picturing Atrocity: Photography in crisis, London: Reacktion Books. (Pp51-61)

Phelan questions what photographs of atrocities prohibit and prevent by examining images through performance. When presented with an atrocity photograph, viewer considers what has been done, what is being done and what they can do to help. In digital photography, the photograph is seen when it is taken and on viewing. Phelan argues there is a blind spot in atrocity photographs so the viewer may not see what the photograph is really depicting because the image is traumatic.

Phelan compares atrocity photographs to Barthes punctum in Camera Lucida where the press of the shutter signals the death of the subject. Barthes thought that a portrait photograph activates mourning through its affective force by providing a space for grief. If the subject is already dead, the viewer goes through more extreme grief because they are reflecting on the literal subject.

Phelan argues that atrocity photographs don’t work like this because they are in the present rather than the past tense. The viewer may find the first reading traumatic and then the image is seen in the past tense. Occasionally an atrocity photograph stands out – one which maintains its “performative force” and not judged on truth. (Phelan, 2012:54).

Atrocity photographs share a link with trauma psychology and may activate a trauma which has not been coded or decoded. People may react to atrocity with disbelief or defensiveness. Culture will affect the way the photograph is regarded. Absorption, repression, political meaning, evidence, art exhibitions and triggers to violence are all ways in which the atrocity may be viewed. Errol Morris (2009) produced a film called Standard Operating Procedure showing some of these images.

The photographs can be viewed through different gazes; the male gaze, imperial colonist gaze, racist gaze as we are used to Hollywood using scenes like this in movies. The Abu Ghraib atrocity images were taken by American soldiers of Iraq prisoners (e.g. Gilligan on a box (2003) Sergeant Ivan Frederick). America looked defensively at these photographs and questions what it said about them rather than being concerned for the prisoners. If these are compared to historical events the present tense is removed making them easier to look at. E.g. The hooded man has his head covered so the viewer does not know who he is and his pose is Christ-like. In other images, prisoners are covered in blood or handcuffed and portrayed as if close to death. This removes the subject from the photograph. Phelan explains that because of this we do not see what is really being portrayed which she described as the blind spot. Photographs are labelled – ideology, sadism, racism, ethical, pornography of war, imprisonment which still does not address the issue. The photographs were taken so that the prisoners would release intelligence information to their interrogators. The photographs are preparation for what comes next in war.

In order to see the photograph, the viewer has to recognise that people can’t see. Didl Huberman explains that

“With the visible, we are of course in the realm of what manifests itself. The visual, by contrast, would designate that irregular net of event symptoms that reaches the visible as so many gleams or radiances, “traces of articulation”, as so many indices…indices of what? Of something – a work, a memory in process, that has been nowhere fully described, attested or set down in an archive, because its signifying “material” is the first of all the image.” (Phelan, 2012:56)

The implied interpretation makes us not see what is in the photograph. Photographs pose as weapons. We ask questions. Torture is made visible. Errol Morris and Philip Gourevitch argue that

“the pose is obviously contrived and theatrical, a deliberate intervention that appears to belong to some dark ritual, a primal scene of martyrdom. The picture transfixes us because it looks like the truth, but looking at it we can only imagine what the truth is: torture, execution and a scene staged for the camera. So we seize on the figure of Gilligan as a symbol that stands for all that was wrong at Abu Ghraib – and all that we cannot and do not want to – understand about how it came to this. (Phelan, 2012:59)


The viewers ask questions such as who, why, what, when, where, how and react differently to the images which contribute to the meaning of how we view Abu Ghraib.

Thursday, 29 June 2017

The Photographic Image in Digital Culture: Susan Murray.

Source: Murray, L. (ed.) (2013) The Photographic Image in Digital Culture: Susan Murray. Abingdon: Routledge. (Pp165-82)

Revisiting Flickr
  • Flickr images organised in groups and batches (technological features) and fetishization, classification, collection, memory, flow, taste, signification, identification (functions).
  • Members page – “decentralised network of similar pages” contributing “to the construction of a community [through keywords tags, comments and contact lists] and larger collection of photographs.” Lister: 2013:165)
  • “Collaborative experience: a shared display of memory, taste, history, daily life and judgement through which amateur and professional photographers collectively articulate a novel, digitized (and decentralised) aesthetic of the everyday.” (Lister: 2013:165)
  • Digital camera is necessary to document daily life, resulting in a temporal shift with our association of everyday images and narratives about ourselves and our relationship with the world.
  • Online photo-sharing with Facebook makes it accessible for anyone to upload whole album in one go to share with family and friends.  Other sites focus on on-line storage with personalised memorabilia such as mugs, I Phone cases.
  • Flickr and Facebook differ in sharing with the community which has enabled the two to remain in the digital world.
  • Flickr influences the development of photographic technique – e.g. filters, calls members artists and concentrates on aesthetic practice rather than online social identities and offline lives.
  • Flickr – slow photography “goal is the experience of studying some object carefully and exercising creative choice.” (Wu as cited by Lister, 2013:168) “Another redefinition in digital practice.” (Lister, 2013:168)
  • Flickr blog - techniques, teaching, sharing – different from other social networking sites.
Brief history of amateur and domestic photography
Zimmerman – Kodak cameras – leisure / consumer activity. “organised social and artistic practice that was valued for its spontaneity, authenticity, naturalness and emotialism (particularly in the widespread use and reference to pictorialism).” (Lister, 2013:169) Two types of amateurs – fun or special events recording and “serious amateurs” who engaged in art and middle to upper class leisure. Professionals worked in studios. Pictorialism was inescapable; people wanted to replicate nature and so modern urban life and subjects which populate social networking sites was considered unacceptable. Zimmerman argued that this “deflected cameras, at least on the discursive level, from insertion into the day to day world of industrial capitalism.” (Lister, 2013:169)

Manovich in 1995 wrote “The logic of the digital photograph is one of historical continuity and discontinuity. The digital image tears apart the net of semiotic codes, modes and of display, and patterns of spectreship in modern visual culture – and at the same time, weaves this net even stronger. The digital image annihilates photography while solidifying, glorifying and immortalising the photograph. In short, this logic is that of photography after photography.” (Lister, 2013:170)

Theorists have now moved past the issue of indexicality and representation to study the materiality, universal presence and ephemeralness of digital photographs and question whether the value and meaning of the images is diminished. Cohen studied photobloggers and noticed that they appeared to post banal images to stress that their images are not traditional snapshot images but life as they experience it.

Transience, collection and the everyday image
Photography linked to history, memory, absence and loss by several writers including Barthes and Benjamin. Pollen argues that Flickr and digital photography websites is more transient than loss. Flickr moves the old photos to the back when new ones are uploaded, providing an autobiographical account of the photographer.

“Mobile imagining as autobiographical practice proceeds according to a logic of catalogue or database...Such a logic privileges techniques of selection and (re)combination, which do not operate according to cause-effect relations.” (Heidi Rae Cooley as cited by Lister, 2013:174)

Some categories on Flickr have very strict rules on what can be included but although the images are all a specific type, they are all unique. E.g doors and windows in decay.
Line is blurred on Flickr between serious amateurs and professionals but clues are present such as comments and followers. New category emerging called “ephemera” because photographs are not as precious as they once were. Disposable – images on memory cards are deleted. Visible straight away and the owner can decide if they keep the image. Taken as everyday moments. Group photo pools have larger albums – shared interests and fetishes.

“Digitisation allows for reinvigoration or remediation of what is essentially a form of album making, which can co-exist with other forms of memory making.” (Hand as cited by Lister, 2013:176)

“While digital photography has become a social tool for “identity, formation, communication and experience” it also remains – like the forms of photography before it – a tool of memory.” (Jose Van Dijk as cited by Lister, 2013:176)

“Digital personal photography gives rise to the new social practices in which pictures are considered visual resources in the microcultures of everyday life. In these microcultures, memory does not so much disappear from the spectrum of social use as it takes on a different meaning.” (Jose Van Dijk as cited by Lister, 2013:176)

Photo sharing and communal aesthetics
Pollen compares Flickr to Bourdieau’s Camera Club studies in that they have similar aspirations and practices although Flickr is much larger with its various communities. Flickr in partnership with Getty images so if some images are chosen, members are paid. Pollen argues that the lines between what is an acceptable image and what is not is blurred, as well as amateurs and professionals being indistinguishable. Whereas old photographs may be scratched or grainy, people seek to do this by decreasing the resolution or compression or adding filters on Instagram or Snapseed; what Manovich calls manipulation.

“While digital photography itself has not revolutionised photography or led to the loss of authenticity of an image as predicted early on, it has significantly altered our relationship to the practice of photography (when coupled with social networking software) as well as to our expectations for and interactions with the image and everyday aesthetic.” (Lister, 2013:180)